Course evaluation is an act of value judgment that evaluates instructors’ teaching activities according to set evaluation standards and methods. Hanyang University conducts course evaluations for all subjects opened in all semesters. Course evaluation is an important system in which students can evaluate the quality, behavior, and ability of the instructor in charge in various ways and present their opinions.

The sprit 토토사이트 evaluation system

Course evaluation questions are divided into course objectives implementation, course planning and composition, curriculum and instructional method, course results and student changes, student self-evaluation, overall satisfaction, and other general matters. The Academic Service Division creates questions by course type, such as in-person, online lectures(recording, live), or hybrid classes, to reflect the diverse types of courses due to COVID-19. In addition, questions for each type of lecture such as discussion, experiment and practice, English-only, IC-PBL, invitational lectures, and smart education are differently composed.

sprit 토토사이트 evaluation results are used for two purposes. For one, the results of lecture evaluation serve as the criteria for re-appointment, promotion, and advancement of instructors. Instructors evaluated as excellent are selected as Best Teacher or excellent instructors and rewarded. Instructors with insufficient sprit 토토사이트 evaluation results will be given penalties such as restrictions on lectures, mandatory completion of teaching method programs, and interviews with department heads. Secondly, the school uses sprit 토토사이트 evaluation results every semester to prepare internal analysis reports. It monitors situations that become an issue by analyzing sprit 토토사이트 evaluation statistics and subjective questionnaire answers by college, department, and sprit 토토사이트 types.

Hanyang's efforts for improving sprit 토토사이트 evaluation results

The school established the Curriculum Council(hereinafter the Council) to improve the quality of education. The Council discussed the development of course evaluation questions for two years from 2015. Lee Mi-young of the Academic Service Division replied, "We developed the course evaluation questions to measure the actual quality of the lecture rather than focusing on the evaluation of the instructor." Since 2020, the committee started policy research to develop new questions in accordance with the changing academic management methods caused by COVID-19. Lee replied, "In order to conduct appropriate course evaluation in the era of online lectures, we tried to develop course evaluation questions suitable for all class types and establish a system that follows changes in education."

Both campuses introduced an interim course evaluation system from the spring semester of 2017. Interim course evaluation is conducted during week 4~5 after the start of the semester and mainly consists of questions to present students’ opinions on required improvements and lecture strengths. Existing course evaluation had the disadvantage that immediate feedback was difficult even if there was a problem with the class. Interim course evaluation can provide a channel to reflect students’ opinions in the middle of the semester to improve insufficient parts and enhance lecture qualities.

The Academic Service Division is preparing conditions for instructors to improve lectures through sprit 토토사이트 evaluation results. HY-Class is a system in which full-time instructors who have proven to have delivered excellent lectures through sprit 토토사이트 evaluation can freely develop new teaching management methods. Through this, instructors can be given autonomy in lectures to combine new content and teaching methods, which will motivate other instructors to hold varied and high-quality lectures.